Atlantic 10 Conference
High MajorWomen's Basketball · 14 teams · 165 scored athletes
Last updated: October 22, 2026 · refreshed daily
Avg NIL Score
Teams
Rhode Island Rams
12 scored players
61.4
Avg
Saint Joseph's Hawks
12 scored players
55.6
Avg
Davidson Wildcats
11 scored players
51.6
Avg
George Washington Revolutionaries
15 scored players
51.3
Avg
Richmond Spiders
10 scored players
51.1
Avg
George Mason Patriots
12 scored players
49.3
Avg
Duquesne Dukes
10 scored players
48.5
Avg
Dayton Flyers
13 scored players
48.4
Avg
Fordham Rams
12 scored players
48.2
Avg
Saint Louis Billikens
8 scored players
47.6
Avg
VCU Rams
10 scored players
45.2
Avg
Loyola Chicago Ramblers
15 scored players
44.3
Avg
La Salle Explorers
14 scored players
43.5
Avg
St. Bonaventure Bonnies
11 scored players
40.8
Avg
Top Athletes
Alyssa Koerkenmeier
C · Saint Louis Billikens
Gabby Casey
G · Saint Joseph's Hawks
Ally Sweeney
G · Richmond Spiders
Sophia Vital
G · Rhode Island Rams
Rachel Ullstrom
G · Richmond Spiders
Aleah Snead
G · Saint Joseph's Hawks
Anovia Sheals
G · George Mason Patriots
Delanie Hill
G · Rhode Island Rams
Anne Bair
G · George Washington Revolutionaries
Rhian Stokes
G · Saint Joseph's Hawks
Methodology
The NILmetrics Score is a 0-100 rating that combines on-court performance, market demand signals, social presence, and risk assessment into a single number. Like Elo for chess or KenPom for basketball, it measures a player's relative standing in the college basketball NIL market — not a guaranteed dollar value or future deal price.
Performance weighs recent box-score production. Market reflects program tier, conference visibility, and demand signals. Social captures verified follower scale. Risk Assessment rewards durable availability over a full sample (a higher score means lower risk). Scores recalculate daily after the overnight game sync, with a full data refresh every Sunday.
Methodology note: women's basketball calibration is developing as the dataset grows. Treat scores as directional while the sample expands.
Read the full methodology →