Big Ten Conference
Power 4Women's Basketball · 18 teams · 238 scored athletes
Last updated: July 21, 2026 · refreshed daily
Avg NIL Score
Teams
UCLA Bruins
10 scored players
75.6
Avg
Ohio State Buckeyes
11 scored players
71.2
Avg
Michigan Wolverines
14 scored players
71.0
Avg
Nebraska Cornhuskers
13 scored players
70.2
Avg
Maryland Terrapins
14 scored players
69.8
Avg
Iowa Hawkeyes
14 scored players
69.7
Avg
USC Trojans
13 scored players
68.7
Avg
Minnesota Golden Gophers
13 scored players
64.8
Avg
Purdue Boilermakers
12 scored players
64.6
Avg
Michigan State Spartans
22 scored players
62.4
Avg
Oregon Ducks
14 scored players
62.3
Avg
Washington Huskies
12 scored players
62.3
Avg
Penn State Lady Lions
12 scored players
61.2
Avg
Illinois Fighting Illini
13 scored players
59.8
Avg
Northwestern Wildcats
12 scored players
59.0
Avg
Wisconsin Badgers
14 scored players
58.8
Avg
Indiana Hoosiers
12 scored players
58.5
Avg
Rutgers Scarlet Knights
13 scored players
52.5
Avg
Top Athletes
JuJu Watkins
G · USC Trojans
Lauren Betts
C · UCLA Bruins
Shay Ciezki
G · Indiana Hoosiers
Jaloni Cambridge
G · Ohio State Buckeyes
Kiki Rice
G · UCLA Bruins
Britt Prince
G · Nebraska Cornhuskers
Jazzy Davidson
G · USC Trojans
Taylor Stremlow
G · Iowa Hawkeyes
Gabriela Jaquez
G · UCLA Bruins
Olivia Olson
G · Michigan Wolverines
Methodology
The NILmetrics Score is a 0-100 rating that combines on-court performance, market demand signals, social presence, and reliability into a single number. Like Elo for chess or KenPom for basketball, it measures a player's relative standing in the college basketball NIL market — not a guaranteed dollar value or future deal price.
Performance weighs recent box-score production. Market reflects program tier, conference visibility, and demand signals. Social captures verified follower scale. Reliability rewards healthy minutes over a full sample. We update scores after every Sunday's full sync.
Methodology note: women's basketball calibration is developing as the dataset grows. Treat scores as directional while the sample expands.
Read the full methodology →