
Horizon League
High MajorWomen's Basketball · 12 teams · 155 scored athletes
Last updated: October 22, 2026 · refreshed daily
Avg NIL Score
Teams

Green Bay Phoenix
16 scored players
55.3
Avg

Purdue Fort Wayne Mastodons
10 scored players
49.4
Avg

Wright State Raiders
12 scored players
49.0
Avg

Milwaukee Panthers
12 scored players
48.6
Avg

Oakland Golden Grizzlies
13 scored players
48.3
Avg

Youngstown State Penguins
10 scored players
48.2
Avg

Robert Morris Colonials
16 scored players
48.0
Avg

IU Indianapolis Jaguars
14 scored players
45.6
Avg

Northern Illinois Huskies
15 scored players
45.5
Avg

Cleveland State Vikings
15 scored players
45.4
Avg

Northern Kentucky Norse
10 scored players
44.9
Avg

Detroit Mercy Titans
12 scored players
42.8
Avg
Top Athletes

Maddy Skorupski
G · Green Bay Phoenix

Makenzie Luehring
G · Oakland Golden Grizzlies

Alana Nelson
F · Purdue Fort Wayne Mastodons

Jenna Guyer
C · Green Bay Phoenix

Kamy Peppler
G · Green Bay Phoenix

Breezie Williams
G · Wright State Raiders

Jorey Buwalda
F · Green Bay Phoenix

Nevaeh Wingate
F · Northern Illinois Huskies

Lauren Lee
G · Purdue Fort Wayne Mastodons

Myriam Traore
F · Robert Morris Colonials
Methodology
The NILmetrics Score is a 0-100 rating that combines on-court performance, market demand signals, social presence, and risk assessment into a single number. Like Elo for chess or KenPom for basketball, it measures a player's relative standing in the college basketball NIL market — not a guaranteed dollar value or future deal price.
Performance weighs recent box-score production. Market reflects program tier, conference visibility, and demand signals. Social captures verified follower scale. Risk Assessment rewards durable availability over a full sample (a higher score means lower risk). Scores recalculate daily after the overnight game sync, with a full data refresh every Sunday.
Methodology note: women's basketball calibration is developing as the dataset grows. Treat scores as directional while the sample expands.
Read the full methodology →