
Southeastern Conference
Power 4Women's Basketball · 16 teams · 197 scored athletes
Last updated: July 21, 2026 · refreshed daily
Avg NIL Score
Teams

South Carolina Gamecocks
13 scored players
74.0
Avg

LSU Tigers
13 scored players
72.4
Avg

Oklahoma Sooners
10 scored players
70.6
Avg

Texas Longhorns
13 scored players
70.4
Avg

Vanderbilt Commodores
14 scored players
65.9
Avg

Kentucky Wildcats
11 scored players
64.6
Avg

Ole Miss Rebels
12 scored players
64.1
Avg

Tennessee Lady Volunteers
14 scored players
64.0
Avg

Mississippi State Bulldogs
11 scored players
63.2
Avg

Missouri Tigers
12 scored players
60.7
Avg

Alabama Crimson Tide
15 scored players
60.7
Avg

Georgia Lady Bulldogs
11 scored players
58.7
Avg

Florida Gators
12 scored players
58.4
Avg

Texas A&M Aggies
12 scored players
53.7
Avg

Arkansas Razorbacks
12 scored players
52.3
Avg

Auburn Tigers
12 scored players
50.6
Avg
Top Athletes

Mikayla Blakes
G · Vanderbilt Commodores

MiLaysia Fulwiley
G · LSU Tigers

Madison Booker
F · Texas Longhorns

Madina Okot
C · South Carolina Gamecocks

Liv McGill
G · Florida Gators

Ta'Niya Latson
G · South Carolina Gamecocks

Tonie Morgan
G · Kentucky Wildcats

Joyce Edwards
F · South Carolina Gamecocks

Flau'jae Johnson
G · LSU Tigers

Raegan Beers
C · Oklahoma Sooners
Methodology
The NILmetrics Score is a 0-100 rating that combines on-court performance, market demand signals, social presence, and reliability into a single number. Like Elo for chess or KenPom for basketball, it measures a player's relative standing in the college basketball NIL market — not a guaranteed dollar value or future deal price.
Performance weighs recent box-score production. Market reflects program tier, conference visibility, and demand signals. Social captures verified follower scale. Reliability rewards healthy minutes over a full sample. We update scores after every Sunday's full sync.
Methodology note: women's basketball calibration is developing as the dataset grows. Treat scores as directional while the sample expands.
Read the full methodology →