Southwestern Athletic Conference
Women's Basketball · 12 teams · 177 scored athletes
Last updated: November 13, 2026 · refreshed daily
Avg NIL Score
Teams
Jackson State Lady Tigers
15 scored players
45.8
Avg
Arkansas-Pine Bluff Golden Lions
13 scored players
44.4
Avg
Grambling Lady Tigers
19 scored players
43.6
Avg
Alabama A&M Bulldogs
15 scored players
42.0
Avg
Southern Jaguars
16 scored players
41.7
Avg
Alabama State Lady Hornets
15 scored players
40.8
Avg
Alcorn State Lady Braves
14 scored players
40.5
Avg
Texas Southern Tigers
14 scored players
40.3
Avg
Bethune-Cookman Wildcats
12 scored players
40.2
Avg
Florida A&M Rattlers
17 scored players
39.6
Avg
Mississippi Valley State Devilettes
16 scored players
37.3
Avg
Prairie View A&M Lady Panthers
11 scored players
36.8
Avg
Top Athletes
Kiarra Henderson
G · Alcorn State Lady Braves
Nakia Cheatham
G · Alcorn State Lady Braves
Jailah Pelly
G · Arkansas-Pine Bluff Golden Lions
Indiya Bowen
G · Arkansas-Pine Bluff Golden Lions
Princess Anderson
G · Grambling Lady Tigers
Shaniah Nunn
SF · Grambling Lady Tigers
Tahnyjia Purifoy
PG · Florida A&M Rattlers
Khaniah Gardner
F · Arkansas-Pine Bluff Golden Lions
Jaileyah Cotton
G · Jackson State Lady Tigers
Caylee Simpson
G · Alabama State Lady Hornets
Methodology
The NILmetrics Score is a 0-100 rating that combines on-court performance, market demand signals, social presence, and risk assessment into a single number. Like Elo for chess or KenPom for basketball, it measures a player's relative standing in the college basketball NIL market — not a guaranteed dollar value or future deal price.
Performance weighs recent box-score production. Market reflects program tier, conference visibility, and demand signals. Social captures verified follower scale. Risk Assessment rewards durable availability over a full sample (a higher score means lower risk). Scores recalculate daily after the overnight game sync, with a full data refresh every Sunday.
Methodology note: women's basketball calibration is developing as the dataset grows. Treat scores as directional while the sample expands.
Read the full methodology →